The Core Ruling: Rituals Over Registration The Supreme Court has emphasized that a Hindu marriage is a "samskara" (sacrament) and not a commercial transaction or a social event for "song and dance." Ceremony is Mandatory: Under Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a marriage is only legally valid if it is performed with the required customary rites and ceremonies (such as the Saptapadi or seven steps around the sacred fire). Registration Isn't Enough: A marriage certificate issued by a registrar does not, by itself, prove a valid marriage. If the actual religious or customary ceremonies were not performed, the marriage is considered void in the eyes of the law, regardless of the certificate. Key Takeaways from the Decision The Court delivered this ruling in the case of Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal (2024), involving a couple who were both pilots. They had registered their marriage for convenience (like visa applications) but had never performed the traditional ceremonies.This ruling specifically applies to marriages governed by the Hindu Marriage Act. If a couple wishes to marry without religious rituals, they can do so legally under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which is a secular law specifically designed for court marriages without the need for rites.
The Core Ruling: Rituals Over Registration The Supreme Court has emphasized that a Hindu marriage is a "samskara" (sacrament) and not a commercial transaction or a social event for "song and dance." Ceremony is Mandatory: Under Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a marriage is only legally valid if it is performed with the required customary rites and ceremonies (such as the Saptapadi or seven steps around the sacred fire). Registration Isn't Enough: A marriage certificate issued by a registrar does not, by itself, prove a valid marriage. If the actual religious or customary ceremonies were not performed, the marriage is considered void in the eyes of the law, regardless of the certificate. Key Takeaways from the Decision The Court delivered this ruling in the case of Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal (2024), involving a couple who were both pilots. They had registered their marriage for convenience (like visa applications) but had never performed the traditional ceremonies.This ruling specifically applies to marriages governed by the Hindu Marriage Act. If a couple wishes to marry without religious rituals, they can do so legally under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which is a secular law specifically designed for court marriages without the need for rites.
- दरभंगा में 6 साल की मासूम के साथ हुई दरिंदगी की घटना ने पूरे इलाके को झकझोर कर रख दिया है। स्थानीय निवासियों में इस घटना को लेकर भारी आक्रोश है और वे न्याय की गुहार लगा रहे हैं। दरभंगा: मासूम से हैवानियत पर फूटा लोगों का गुस्सा बिहार के दरभंगा से एक रूह कंपा देने वाली घटना सामने आई है, जहाँ एक 6 साल की मासूम बच्ची को हैवानियत का शिकार बनाया गया। इस घटना के विरोध में स्थानीय लोग सड़कों पर उतर आए हैं और आरोपी के खिलाफ सख्त से सख्त कार्रवाई की मांग कर रहे हैं। मुख्य बिंदु: मासूम से दरिंदगी: पीड़ित बच्ची की उम्र महज 6 साल बताई जा रही है। आरोपी की पहचान: प्रदर्शनकारियों के अनुसार, आरोपी का नाम विकास महतो है, जिसकी उम्र लगभग 25 वर्ष है। जनता की मांग: गुस्साई महिलाओं और स्थानीय लोगों ने आरोपी को फांसी की सजा देने की मांग की है। प्रदर्शन के दौरान "तनु के हत्यारे को फांसी दो" जैसे नारे लगाए गए और टायर जलाकर विरोध प्रदर्शन किया गया। पुलिस प्रशासन की भूमिका: प्रदर्शनकारियों ने पुलिस प्रशासन पर भी अपना गुस्सा जाहिर किया है। हालांकि पुलिस ने आरोपी को पकड़ लिया है, लेकिन लोगों को डर है कि उसे कड़ी सजा नहीं मिलेगी।1
- Post by Md Akhtar1
- “गया जी: निगरानी विभाग ने ₹50, 000 की रिश्वत लेते हुए BDO को रंगे हाथों पकड़ा ।”1
- हुलास गंज सीएचसी में प्रधानमंत्री सुरक्षित मातृत्व योजना के तहत 102गर्भवती महिलाओं के प्रसव पूर्व स्वास्थ्य की हुई जांच।1
- Post by सतरंगी जहानाबादी (public news)1
- प्रधान पद प्रत्याशी दीपू दुबे नारायणपुर ललक1
- रविवार को राजस्व पटवारी मुंशी संघ, नालंदा द्वारा परफेक्ट मैरेज हॉल, नालंदा में एक आवश्यक बैठक का आयोजन किया गया। बैठक में सरकार के ज्ञापांक संख्या–556, जो बिहार सरकार के अपर सचिव डॉ० महेन्द्र पाल से प्राप्त निर्देश के आलोक में जारी किया गया है, उस पर चर्चा की गई।1
- The Core Ruling: Rituals Over Registration The Supreme Court has emphasized that a Hindu marriage is a "samskara" (sacrament) and not a commercial transaction or a social event for "song and dance." Ceremony is Mandatory: Under Section 7 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, a marriage is only legally valid if it is performed with the required customary rites and ceremonies (such as the Saptapadi or seven steps around the sacred fire). Registration Isn't Enough: A marriage certificate issued by a registrar does not, by itself, prove a valid marriage. If the actual religious or customary ceremonies were not performed, the marriage is considered void in the eyes of the law, regardless of the certificate. Key Takeaways from the Decision The Court delivered this ruling in the case of Dolly Rani v. Manish Kumar Chanchal (2024), involving a couple who were both pilots. They had registered their marriage for convenience (like visa applications) but had never performed the traditional ceremonies.This ruling specifically applies to marriages governed by the Hindu Marriage Act. If a couple wishes to marry without religious rituals, they can do so legally under the Special Marriage Act, 1954, which is a secular law specifically designed for court marriages without the need for rites.1